Sunday, August 15, 2010

Kicking Off Ramadaan In Style

On August 3rd, 2010, White House Press Secretary (for now) Robert Gibbs was asked about the Obama Administration's stance on the controversial mosque being proposed within rifle-range of Ground Zero.  At that time, Gibbs said
" I’m not from here going to get involved in local decision-making like that."
Aside from being comically ironic, considering the President has involved himself in local decision-making plenty of times so far (like this time... and this time) with astounding effect, it seemed obvious that the White House was going to try to duck-and-cover on this sensitive issue.

That is, it seemed that way until Friday night.

According to the President, people are sensitive to this because they are traumatized by 9/11 (no shit).  But, his implication is that the trauma involved somehow makes the opposition to the location of the mosque unwarranted.

His words, before a group of hungry Muslims, went on to shed light on his reasoning behind this stance.  Well, his reasons beyond that he is an Islamic sympathizer, of course.
"Let me be clear: as a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country".
I don't think anybody disagrees there.  Please continue, Mr. President.
"That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances".
And this is where--after much personal careful deliberation-- I do disagree.  Careful deliberation and the United States Constitution.  This amazing document pretty well covers all the important stuff, and it is very clear on this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
You see, because New York City has already 100 mosques throughout the city, there is no impediment on Islamic worship.  In fact, nobody is saying that can't build a giant mosque, just that they cannot build a giant mosque THERE.

I always hear that there are, in fact, good Muslims out there.  Peaceful ones, ones that hate radical Islam and their murderous ways.  But, in a situation like this, when a group is being purposefully controversial and creating a greater divide between the Islamic faith and the rest of America-- where are the good Muslims?  Why aren't they speaking out, or pleading with these religious leaders to move their plans to a more respectful location?

Watch the President's remarks, and the "good Muslims" in attendance applause of religious divisiveness.

And, while I'm asking questions, what ever happened to common sense?  Democratic Senatorial candidate, Jeff Greene, also wonders.
"Freedom of religion might provide the right to build the mosque in the shadow of Ground Zero, but common sense and respect for those who lost their lives and loved ones gives sensible reason to build the mosque someplace else. President Obama had the chance to show leadership by calling on the mosque's supporters to find a more appropriate location".
 I guess, as it turns out, it is easier to find a good Democrat than a good Muslim.



1 comments:

Storme said...

This is not a matter of religious rights. There are 100s of Christian Churches and synagogues who have petitioned for building sites who have not been allowed to do so. This is "Cordoba" which makes it a victory mosque (when the Moors or "Moops", a'la George Costanza conquered Spain they moved the capital to Cordoba). Having a 9/11 ground-breaking date is not a coincidence. Obama iswhoring for Arab campaign dollars and Muslim votes just like he's doing with the border controversy. This guy is dangerous.

Post a Comment