On August 3rd, 2010, White House Press Secretary (for now) Robert Gibbs was asked about the Obama Administration's stance on the
controversial mosque being proposed within rifle-range of Ground Zero. At that time, Gibbs said
" I’m not from here going to get involved in local decision-making like that."
Aside from being comically ironic, considering the President has involved himself in local decision-making plenty of times so far (like
this time... and
this time) with astounding effect, it seemed obvious that the White House was going to try to duck-and-cover on this sensitive issue.
That is, it seemed that way until Friday night.
According to the President, people are sensitive to this because they are traumatized by 9/11 (no shit). But, his implication is that the trauma involved somehow makes the opposition to the location of the mosque unwarranted.
His words, before a group of hungry Muslims, went on to shed light on his reasoning behind this stance. Well, his reasons beyond that he is an Islamic sympathizer, of course.
"Let me be clear: as a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country".
I don't think anybody disagrees there. Please continue, Mr. President.
"That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances".
And this is where--after much personal careful deliberation-- I
do disagree. Careful deliberation and the
United States Constitution. This amazing document pretty well covers all the important stuff, and it is very clear on this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
You see, because New York City has already
100 mosques throughout the city, there is no impediment on Islamic worship. In fact, nobody is saying that can't build a giant mosque, just that they cannot build a giant mosque
THERE.
